calender

1.61,2

VS. 3.2 Days length of stay

home

91.5%1,3

VS. 27.3% Discharged home

readmission

2.3%1,3

VS. 4.2% Readmission rate

SuperPath Patient

Established clinical results

A growing number of experienced surgeons across the world have embraced SuperPath as their preferred total hip technique to deliver faster recovery to patients. When compared to national averages, patients treated with the SuperPath® hip technique have stayed in the hospital for a shorter amount of time, been discharged directly to their home more often, and are less likely to return within 30 days for any reason - all without the typical postoperative hip restrictions associated with traditional THA techniques.1-3

CTA Surgeon SuperPath

Get patients home faster

Because the tissues surrounding the hip are not traumatized, many patients are able to return to mobility within days, rather than weeks or months. A number of patients who have undergone this procedure are able to walk unassisted the day after surgery.

CONTACT US FOR MORE INFORMATION

 

PRECAUTIONS & DISCLAIMERS

Every patient is different, and individual results will vary. There are risks and recovery times associated with surgery.

Not all products and options are available in all countries.

018123

  • References
    1. As compared to traditional hip arthroplasty. Gofton W, Chow J, Olsen KD, Fitch DA. Thirty-day readmission rate and discharge status following hip arthroplasty using the supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip surgical technique. Int Orthop 2015;39:847-51.
    2. As compared to traditional hip arthroplasty. AHRQ HCUPnet (2012) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality H-CUPnet Database, ICD-9-CM Code 81.51 for United States in 2011. http://hcupnet.ahrq. gov/HCUPnet.jsp. Accessed 4 Sept 2014.
    3. As compared to traditional hip arthroplasty. Pugely AJ, Callagham JJ, Martin CT, Cram P, Gao Y (2013) Incidence of and risk factors for 30-day readmission following elective primary total joint arthroplasty: analysis from the ACS-NSQIP. J Arthroplast. 28(9):1499-1504. doi:10.1016/ j.arth.2013.06.032